Identify one key piece of legislation that is in the California state legislative process
There is a bill analysis section on the website where I’ve posted the link for the bill that can be used as sources
Select a bill that has been proposed in response to a perceived public health problem and write an APA format and style paper that is three (3) pages in length (this is for the body of the paper, i.e. this excludes the cover page, abstract, etc.).
Abstract: Provide a 150-250 word abstract as a single paragraph without paragraph indention. This is a concise summary of the key points of your analysis (not the bill or health problem). It should contain the health problem, what is the policy chosen and what it is trying to achieve, recommendations, and conclusions. Abstract should be a single paragraph double-spaced. This should be one of the last sections prepared, as the abstract is a summary of the main points of your paper.
Introduction to the problem: Create a succinct overview of the public health problem to be addressed. Introduce the general scope of the bill. Here you can include some very general statistics to lay the foundation of your analysis, but limit this as you will expand on this aspect in the next section.
The severity of health problem: Discuss the severity of the problem; the number of people affected by the identified problem and the proposed bill. Present and discuss more detailed numbers here (look up studies and reliable reports indicating patterns related to the specific aspect of the health problem you are addressing). Discuss the research behind the health problem. Cite all references to the literature as required.
Overview of the bill and stakeholders: Create a brief overview of the proposed bill in terms of its specific provisions . Do not just discuss what the promoters promise it will accomplish, and do not copy the bill text, rather present it in your own words and cite as required. Make sure to read the fine print and see exactly what the bill will do
Promoters and opposing groups: Discuss who the promoters of the bill and what the promoters of the bill believe the bill will accomplish (e.g. specific health outcomes). Investigate which groups registered in support of and against the bill (not those who have voted for or against the bill). Do not report on members who have voted for or against the bill. Describe which individuals and/or groups are opposed to the bill, you may group them if there are many. Delineate what are their issues with the bill. You can research special interest groups, such as professional trade associations and industry groups to see what type of lobbying efforts are being made with respect to the bill. Focus on the bill analysis files as a starting point and look for those that registering their opposition to the bill.
Recommendations and final analysis: Describe your recommendations based on your research and analysis of the bill; this is not the place to state your personal opinion or beliefs. Rather focus on how to improve the health outcomes described in the bill through recommendations that focus on the policy aspect. Substantiate your position with the facts and with support from the class readings, other relevant material discussed in class, as well as outside references.
Conclusion: Here you will wrap up what you have been discussing in your analysis above. After moving from general to specific information in the introduction and body paragraphs, your conclusion should begin pulling back into more general information that restates the main points of the health problem and how the bill addresses this particular problem
Mechanics: readability, English usage, adherence to APA style (title page, abstract, body with specific headers, etc.). The reference section needs to include at least three quality sources that are appropriate for the specific section (for example, you will need reputable statistical sources for the severity section). The bill and all bill analysis files do NOT count toward this requirement.
SB, Glazer. State parks: state beaches: smoking ban
Senate bill number 8 written by state Sen. Steve Glazer: Current regulation makes it an infraction punishable through a high-quality of $250 for a person to smoke a cigarette, cigar, or other tobacco product inside 25 feet of a playground or tot lot sandbox location. This bill could make it an infraction punishable by way of a satisfactory of up to $25 for someone to smoke, as defined, on a state beach, as described, or in a unit of the state park system, as described, except as furnished, or to put off used cigar or cigarette waste on a state beach or in a unit of the nation park system unless the disposal is made in the suitable waste receptacle. The invoice would set up a nation-mandated nearby application by means of creating a new crime. The bill might require the branch of Parks and recreation to increase and post signs at strategic places, as determined through the Director of Parks and Recreation, of state beaches and units of the state park system operated through the branch to offer notice of the smoking prohibition. The bill would require the smoking prohibition to be enforced at a state beach or unit of the state park system most effective after suitable signs were published pursuant to these provisions.
Californians will be banned from smoking at state parks and beaches under new law. (2019, October 12). Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-11/californians-banned-smoking-state-parks-beaches (Links to an external site.)
Royal, A. (2019, December 20). 2020 new laws: Making state beaches smoke free in California. Retrieved from https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/politics/new-california-beach-laws/509-c4b52914-b2c0-4844-a7e6-f08ab832e2de (Links to an external site.)
SB 8 (Glazer) / AB 1718 (Levine)-Smoking ban for State Parks and Beaches. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cawrecycles.org/sb-8-glazer-/-ab-1718-levine